Pics of women showing skin

  • June 21, 2011 2:10 AM PDT

    I have some pics I am trying to post of women showing large areas of skin, no boob shots, no nipples, and no genitalia, just skin. The file size is 400-700k. and extension is jpg.

    Something blocks these photos every time. as soon as I post them.  I get a HTTP ERROR Code 500 as soon as I post them.  I see others post shots of women that have massive amounts of skin showing, how do they get them to post?

    I asked if they have a filter that blocks large amounts of skin tone but was told they aren't running any filters.

    Has anyone else experienced these kinds of difficulties posting pics of women?

    This is getting old. 

    Joe Skaggs

    • Moderator
    • 19067 posts
    June 21, 2011 2:15 AM PDT
    I don't think it is a filter. Are they 16 bit or 8 bit, RGB or CMYK? I believe JPG supports 16 bit cmyk files.
    8 bit rgb should work. If they are correct send a PM direct to Lucky. He will solve the dilemma.
  • June 21, 2011 2:26 AM PDT
    Thanks Rex, I'll try that.

    Wondering why non-skin shots will post with not a problem?
    • 910 posts
    June 21, 2011 2:29 AM PDT
    Also, make sure there are no spaces and characters in the filename.
    • 910 posts
    June 21, 2011 2:30 AM PDT
    were they taken on the same day with the same camera and saved the same way as the ones not posting?
    • 5420 posts
    June 21, 2011 4:54 AM PDT
    test
    • 5420 posts
    June 21, 2011 4:58 AM PDT
    OK, It appears there is a slight bug we need to look into.

    The actual photo size, not the file size was too large. Each picture was over 4000 pixels in width and since the forum resizes pictures to 640 pixels on upload the system resources were being exceeded when attempting to upload and auto resize.

    I am going to look into allocating more system resources to the upload function, in the meantime you will want to resize your images to a width of less than 1500 pixels before uploading.
  • June 21, 2011 5:00 AM PDT
    Good test Lucky!!
  • June 21, 2011 6:05 AM PDT
    Thanks Lucky. You came up with a fix. You were right resolution has to be less than 1500 pixels wide.
    Sorry you had to explain it so many times. I wasn’t trying to cause you an aneurism.
    Thanks for the fix, I appreciate it.
    joe
    • 2 posts
    June 21, 2011 6:23 AM PDT
    What a crashing disappointment this thread turned out to be
    • Moderator
    • 19067 posts
    June 22, 2011 12:47 AM PDT
    Awe poor savage....